"CTA resistance: 4 of 6 segments"
"Bias detected across 3 demographics"
"Emerging theme: convenience vs. tradition"
"Cultural sensitivity flag raised"
"11 themes discovered across 22 personas"
"Comprehension gap: low-literacy segment"

Perspectives you're missing. In minutes.

Test how real audiences react to your creative, answer your research questions, or probe your AI system — before you ship to the people who matter.

Evidence

See What Diverse Perspectives Reveal

Real evaluations and research — from academic studies to ad campaigns.

evaluation

We tested 7 UK government ads on 36 synthetic personas

Seven UK government ads on teaching, pensions and Stoptober, each watched by 12 synthetic personas. Watch the ads, see the scores and read what they said.

  • Get Into Teaching: all 12 personas preferred the ad that follows a pupil through school. It scored 62 out of 100 against 37.
  • Workplace pensions: a tie at 57 each. One ad makes the better case, the other gives the clearer next step.
Read Analysis
ad analysis

Burger King 'There's A New King' — Full Creative-Testing Dashboard

Chorus's 12-persona creative-testing dashboard for Burger King's 2026 'There's A New King' — emotion arc, per-persona signals, scene heatmap, and timestamped edit suggestions.

  • The 0:32 'we fell off' admission is the single highest-agreement moment across all 12 personas (0.98) — widely read as bold, credible, trust-building.
  • Five cross-persona convergence beats spanning the full arc: transparency pivot, customer-complaint board, mascot firing, fresh-prep montage, closing turnaround plan — agreement scores 0.72 to 0.98.
Read Analysis
focus group

Gillette 'We Believe' Advertisement - Focus Group Research

Audience panel on Gillette's 'We Believe' toxic masculinity ad. 9 perspectives, 35 questions, 6.4/10 overall. Strong message clarity, weak conversion pathway.

  • Overall score 6.4/10 with deeply polarized sentiment — 44% negative, 22% very positive
  • Brand recall (9.5/10) and message clarity (9.0/10) scored highest — everyone remembers it, everyone understands it
Read Analysis
Why Navay

Research and evaluation,
without the wait

You need to understand how people will react — to your content, your product, your policy, your idea. But recruiting real participants takes weeks and costs thousands. So most teams guess, or skip research entirely.

Chorus gives you a panel of synthetic personas — detailed individuals built from real demographic, psychographic, and cultural data — that can evaluate your content or answer your research questions. You get structured, diverse perspectives in minutes, not weeks.

  • Speed: Results in minutes, not weeks
  • Diversity: Evaluate across audience segments in minutes
  • Honesty: Direct audience signal without groupthink
  • Cost: Fraction of traditional research

Sample Audience Readout

Young Professionals, 25–34

Signal: Headline resonates, but CTA feels too aggressive

First-Time Investors, 30–40

Signal: Risk disclosure language unclear. Missed key terms.

Fault Line

"Technical audiences find it clear. Non-experts find it confusing."

Validation work

We test the method in the open

We replicate published research and match our creative reads against independent third-party benchmarks — publishing what we agree on, what we miss, and why.

Validation Study · Complete April 2026

Replicating a Peer-Reviewed Food Study: A Focus Group Recovered All 10 Phase 2 Sub-Themes

We re-ran Kumar, Kulkarni & Rathi (2022, Frontiers in Nutrition) on our platform. A follow-up focus group with 16 synthetic personas recovered all 10 Phase 2 sub-themes in a deductive comparison — plus 4 additional frames, including gendered food labor and efficiency-vs-meaning. An earlier 22-person coding pass recovered 8 fully, 1 in adjacent form, and missed 1.

"My daily eating habits are now dictated as much by my glucometer as they are by my appetite."
— Mathew Kuriakose, 46, Thrissur (synthetic persona)
Read the full study
10/10
Phase 2 sub-themes
recovered
+ 4 new frames
from group format
Validation Study · Complete April 2026

Validating Creative Testing Against System1: Same Direction, Independently Located Evidence

System1 Group rated Burger King's 2026 "There's A New King" spot 3.8★ with Exceptional Spike and Fluency, describing sincerity and a negative-to-positive resolution. Chorus reached the same broad positive direction and mechanism; independently, its 12-persona panel found its own strongest consensus at the 0:32 "we fell off" admission.

"By the end, any negative emotions have faded away and the upbeat message of change is resonating."
— Tom Ewing, System1 Group
Read the full study
0:32
panel's strongest
consensus moment
Located by Chorus;
not attributed to System1

Ready to understand your audience?

Run research, test content, explore ideas — with diverse synthetic perspectives in minutes.